Engineering Management Capstone Project Em 697: Compare and Contrast Risk Management Implementation at NASA and the US Army

$15.75

This book provides an in-depth case study on risk management in engineering, suitable for advanced students in the field.

Engineering Management Capstone Project Em 697: Compare and Contrast Risk Management Implementation at NASA and the US Army
Engineering Management Capstone Project Em 697: Compare and Contrast Risk Management Implementation at NASA and the US Army
$15.75

[wpforms id=”1190″ title=”true” description=”Request a call back”]

NASA at Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and the U.S. Army at Redstone Arsenal were analyzed to determine whether they were successful in implementing their risk management program. Risk management implementation surveys were distributed to aid in this analysis. The scope is limited to NASA S&MA (Safety and Mission Assurance) at MSFC, including applicable support contractors, and the US Army Engineering Directorate, including applicable contractors, located at Redstone Arsenal. NASA has moderately higher risk management implementation survey scores than the Army. Accordingly, the implementation of the risk management program at NASA is considered good while only two of five of the survey categories indicated that the risk management implementation is good at the Army.

Additional information

Dimensions 18.9 × 0.2 × 24.6 in

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “Engineering Management Capstone Project Em 697: Compare and Contrast Risk Management Implementation at NASA and the US Army”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *